The Bush & Harriman Crime Families

The Harriman family, the Bush family, and their connection to the Nazis is a topic that has gained widespread attention in recent years, especially in the wake of the declassification of government documents. The linkage between powerful American families and the Nazi regime is undoubtedly a complex and contentious issue that necessitates an in-depth understanding of it.

Edward Henry Harriman, the patriarch of the Harriman family, was a prominent American businessman and railroad executive. He frequently visited Germany and Austria, where he became acquainted with German industrialists. Harriman’s interactions with German businessmen reportedly influenced some of his progressive economic positions. Furthermore, his closeness to these individuals is rumored to have been used to describe his apparent support for the Nazi regime.

W. Averell Harriman, Edward’s son, was a highly influential figure in American politics. He was appointed as the ambassador to the Soviet Union during World War II and later became the assistant Secretary of State under Truman. However, before his political career, Averell Harriman worked for his father’s investment firm, W.A. Harriman & Co. during the interwar period. During this time, some of the firm’s clients included German businesses with connections to the Nazi Party.

In terms of the Bush family’s connection to Nazism, the link can be traced back to Prescott Bush, George H.W. Bush’s father, who was a wealthy banker. In the early 1930s, Prescott served on the board of directors of the Union Banking Corporation, which was actively involved in financing German industrial projects. Moreover, according to several reports, he continued to do business with Nazi-related companies, even after the United States entered the war.

Furthermore, rumors have persisted that some members of the Bush family financed the Nazi Party. While some of these claims remain unsubstantiated, documents from the National Archives reveal that the Bush family was involved in several investments that supported the Nazis. Recipients of these investments included the German Steel Trust and several other industrial firms.

The extent of the Harriman and Bush family’s connections to the Nazi Party is still unclear, but many critics have cited their associations with German businesses as evidence of an indirect collaboration with the Nazis. However, defenders of the families contend that these business relationships were made purely for the sake of making profit, rather than any kind of political or ideological affiliation with the Nazis.

Regardless of whether the allegations are true or not, the families have sustained their positions of power in politics and business. Both the Harriman and Bush families have held high-ranking positions in the American government throughout much of the twentieth century, with many of its members continuing to hold positions of influence today.

In addition, the topic has become the subject of countless conspiracy theories, which has further contributed to the prevalence of this issue in popular culture.
It is worth noting that researchers have debated the extent of the Harriman and Bush family’s connections to the Nazis over the years. While it is clear that both family dynasties had business dealings with Nazi-associated businesses, that does not necessarily indicate direct political support of the Nazi regime.

Nonetheless, it is essential to investigate the nature of these associations not only in terms of historical accuracy but also as a means of understanding the extent of the role of corporations in shaping political ideology.

Moreover, the patterns that emerged during the Second World War, concerning the use of businesses as instruments of political influence, continue to occur across the globe. Powerful business figures have developed significant leverage overstates, often influencing political policies that tilt towards corporate ends rather than the interest of the masses.

Connecting the dots between reputedly powerful families and corporations tend to foster a sense of bias in many people. However, this issue should not be viewed solely as a responsibility of one group or the other but as a systemic issue. Thus, it is not a question of whether individuals or families were implicated in wrongdoing, but how to ensure impartial mechanisms that secure accountability of people and corporations.

In conclusion, the Harriman and Bush families’ connections to Nazi Germany are a facet of the complex relationship between corporations, politics, and capitalism in America. While exact facts remain elusive, the scope of this research presents an excellent opportunity to evaluate the potential of business interests to steer the public policy of a State. Toward this end, it is essential for historians, educators, and policymakers to study and reflect on this aspect of American history to prevent future lapses of integrity.